Complete Clarity Solicitors


Ordinary Action Court - Scotland

the times
Family Law solicitors
family law
the law society

Ordinary Action Court - Scotland

In the rich tapestry of Scottish civil law, Ordinary Actions are pivotal, facilitating a structured approach to resolving more complex legal disputes beyond the scope of simplified procedures. These actions are integral to the Court of Session and Sheriff Courts, where they navigate the complexities of civil law, ensuring justice through a meticulous and comprehensive process.

What Exactly Are Ordinary Actions?

At its core, an Ordinary Action in Scotland pertains to civil court proceedings that are too complex or significant in value to be classified as small claims or summary causes. These cases often involve intricate legal issues, substantial financial stakes, or both, necessitating a detailed examination of evidence and legal arguments. Ordinary Actions provide a framework for these disputes to be explored in depth, offering a pathway to resolution that prioritises thoroughness and fairness.

The Process Unveiled: Ordinary Cause Rules

Navigating an Ordinary Action involves several key stages, starting with the writ or summons—a document outlining the pursuer’s claims against the defender. This document sets the stage for the legal battle ahead, detailing the grievances and the remedies sought.

Following the initiation, the defender has an opportunity to respond, either by agreeing to the claims (in which case the court may issue a decree) or contesting them, leading to a more involved legal process. This process includes a debate or proof before a judge, where both sides present their arguments, evidence, and witness testimonies.

The culmination of an Ordinary Action is a judgment by the court, which may then be enforced or appealed, depending on the outcome and the wishes of the involved parties.

After the Initial Writ has been drafted, what goes next?

The Initial Writ must be submitted by the Pursuer to the appropriate sheriff court. A filing fee will be required by the court to initiate the legal proceeding.  They will petition the court for an order permitting service of the Initial Writ on the Defender by the Pursuer.  The court will issue the order if it finds the Initial Writ to be satisfactory in its substance.  “Warrant of Citation” is the designation for this decree. The court will subsequently return the documents to the Pursuer, enabling them to commence the legal proceeding by serving the defender with the documentation and the Warrant of Citation.

Complete Clarity – Solicitors in Glasgow, East Kilbride & Edinburgh – Contact Details

Complete Clarity Solicitors are based in Glasgow, East Kilbride & Edinburgh however with our unique teleconferencing facilities, you do not even need to visit our office for legal advice. For a Free* consultation with our housing law solicitors, call us today on 0808 169 7033 or complete our online enquiry form and let us help you.

In what manner may the Defender receive the Initial Writ?

There are particular regulations governing service that necessitate meticulous examination.  The Initial Writ must be accompanied by the completion of multiple forms.  The Defender may be served with the forms and initial Writ via recorded delivery post or by sheriff officers.  Alternatively, if the solicitors of the Pursuer and Defender have previously corresponded, the parties may reach an agreement that the document can be delivered to their solicitors for service upon the Defender.

In the Options Hearing, what alternatives are available?

Each of the available options is denoted by a technical term.  Nevertheless, these proceedings typically entail the court requesting a detailed examination of the facts or the law and are characterised as follows:

  • A hearing on a preliminary matter that necessitates the presentation of both legal arguments and evidence: The phrase “proof before answer” refers to this.
  • A “debate” refers to a hearing on a preliminary point (see above) that requires only legal arguments;
  • A hearing on the merits of the case, in which neither party raises any preliminary arguments, in which the court must establish evidence: this is referred to as “proof”; or
  • Should the court determine that additional matters remain to be resolved before scheduling the substantive hearing, it may set a procedural hearing date and, in most cases, require one or both parties to resolve specific concerns before that date.

Get in touch
We’re here to help

Please note: We do not offer legal aid

request call icon

What happens next?